The Situation:

Act III of Macbeth is where it all starts to come unravelled for our intrepid hero. He sends murderers to kill Banquo and Fleance, and then is almost immediately confronted by his BFF's ghost at a feast, which results in some enjoyably twitchy awkwardness.

It all seems fairly straightforward, except for one thing: the mysterious appearance of a third murderer in Act III sc iii. Once again, Shakespeare has decided to toy with us, and give us what seems to be an unsolvable puzzle: Who is the Third Murderer?

The interwebz will lead you to several suspects (Macbeth himself, Lady Mac, Lennox, Ross...one badly supported student essay online is certain that it's Macduff, and another fairly legitimate seeming article will suggest that he's not really a man at all, but the physical manifestation of Macbeth's paranoid willpower), so there's not much joy to be had in just Googling it. Guess you'll just have to hash it out amongst yourselves and make up your own mind.

The Assignment:

a) In an informally written blog post of about 500 words, choose a suspect for the Third Murderer and attempt to prove, using evidence from the play itself and your native wits, that your suspect is the most likely candidate.

b) Make specific references to the text (plot elements, speech patterns, quotations, etc.) to support your theory. You may also make reference to life, movies, other things you've read, etc., so long as it's relevant and supports your idea. Be sure to cite or quote your supporting material.

c) Finally, somewhere in your blog you must make a detailed comment about at least one classmate's posting, agreeing, disagreeing, or taking the discussion in a different direction.

*Include your NAME in the title of your entry.
**You may use graphics and images to help illustrate your points (Breaton loves some delicious memes).
***To make a new post, look in the top right corner of this blog page for a "New Post" button.

HEADS UP!
You may notice that there are a lot of people in this blog, and not necessarily folks from your class. That's because this is the first time I've invited two concurrent classes to the same blog for a giant cage-match discussion. So, you're not just competing against your own classmates, you're also in it against my other English class as well. Heh heh. Have fun!
Dig deep. Take no prisoners.

Thursday, 4 October 2018

Third Murderer Kaley DeMont

Mysterious Third Murderer: Kaley DeMont
Act 3 Scene 3
  Image result for macbeth and the attendant
The third murderer could be anybody in my opinion, there's so many people to choose from. But the third murderer has to be someone that Macbeth trusts enough to kill Banquo and won't betray him unless Macbeth did not send another murderer. The murderer also couldn't have been at the feast either because Macbeth would have known they were gone. I think no one in the play will have Macbeth's trust because he said he doesn't trust anybody anymore, and he only trusts himself. So therefore I think the third murderer is the Attendant.

The first reason why I think the third murderer is the Attendant is because he was the only person that could have known about the plan about killing Banquo. The Attendant was the person that opened the doors for the two murderers and lead them to see Macbeth. In the play after Macbeth tells the attendant to bring the two murderers to him it says “ Now go to the door, and stay there till we call [Exit Attendant],” (III.i.78) that doesn’t necessarily mean that he went far enough to not hear Macbeth talking to them. I think he only went around the corner and as soon as he heard them talking about killing Banquo he listened to the there whole conversation which told him the plan. The attendant might have a motive about killing Banquo for some reason.

The next reason why I think it's the Attendant because macbeth doesn't trust anybody not even his own wife. If he couldn't even trust and tell his own wife that he was going to murder Banquo and his son Fleance then why would he tell anybody else? That's right he wouldn't because the only other person that knows about who killed Duncan is Lady Macbeth which I would assume he would go to her about another killing. Also when he was talking to the murderers that was the only time he talked about his plan out loud and the only person that could have overheard the conversation was the attendant. He was only waiting outside and could have eavesdropped on the plan and conversation.

Related image

The last reason is that the third murderer couldn't have been at the feast and banquet because people would notice that someone part of the celebration was missing. In scene 4 right under where it says it, it is the list of people that was at the banquet and those were all the lead suspects in the play. It says Enter Macbeth, Lady Macbeth, Ross, Lennox, Lords and Attendants. Even tho it says Attendants they are nobodies to the high class royalty in the Palace so no one would notice that one of them were gone, so he could easily sneak into and out of the party without anybody noticing he was there or gone.

I agree with Morgan because I also thought it was the Attendant, we thought very similar in our ideas about the evidence on why he would be there murderer. I like how she had lots of quotations to back up her statements about the attendant and we both noticed that below where is says scene 4 it lists the names of the people that entered the palace to help prove each of our theories. I like how she used connections in her blog about macbeth and the murderer.